Unitarist perspective of the employment relationship

unitarist perspective of the employment relationship

The analytical tools of HRM HRM is the modern form that a unitarist approach to IR typically takes, that is: – the management of the employment relationship. May 3, “Industrial relations cover the relationship between management and . Totally, the two theory was share a different perspectives as well as. Industrial relations scholars such as Alan Fox have described The three views are generally known as unitarism.

Third parties are viewed as irrelevant as employees and employers have a mutual cooperation.

HRM 107 : Unitarism, Pluralism and Radicalism

Unitarism consist of management and staff members sharing a common goal, through their loyalty towards the organisation Fox, Companies who use this approach depends their workplace on strong sense of cooperation between the employer and employee, which allows workers to focus on the primary aim.

In addition, companies with this approach may experience poor communications and misunderstanding between the employees and employers. Ultimately, limiting the company to strengthen the performance of employment relations.

The pluralism frame of reference focuses more on compromising and collective bargaining as it recognises different interests within sub-groups can cause conflict, primarily between the management and trade union. Contrasted to unitarism, pluralism recognise the importance of conflict and negotiation.

Cradden emphasise that companies that utilise this practice values negotiation and coming to an agreeable resolution that benefits both the employees and employers equally.

unitarist perspective of the employment relationship

A major limitation of this approach is the power and control that managers possess. Managers have the authority to propose a solution when conflicts cannot be resolved through negotiation. This emphasises the primary power belongs to the manager, thus could increase the frustration of employees within a company. Lastly, the radical approach to IR suggest that employs and employers are bound to have conflict due to the result of capitalism.

A unitarist perspective: HRM (cont.)

Although, most managers are drawn to this concept, some major drawbacks include the potential of inequality of power towards the employers. Industrial relations has three faces: In this vein, industrial relations scholarship intersects with scholarship in labour economicsindustrial sociologylabour and social historyhuman resource managementpolitical sciencelawand other areas.

unitarist perspective of the employment relationship

Industrial relations scholarship assumes that labour markets are not perfectly competitive and thus, in contrast to mainstream economic theoryemployers typically have greater bargaining power than employees.

Industrial relations scholarship also assumes that there are at least some inherent conflicts of interest between employers and employees for example, higher wages versus higher profits and thus, in contrast to scholarship in human resource management and organizational behaviourconflict is seen as a natural part of the employment relationship.

Industrial relations - Wikipedia

Industrial relations scholars therefore frequently study the diverse institutional arrangements that characterize and shape the employment relationship—from norms and power structures on the shop floor, to employee voice mechanisms in the workplace, to collective bargaining arrangements at company, regional, or national level, to various levels of public policy and labour law regimes,[ citation needed ] to varieties of capitalism [10] such as corporatismsocial democracyand neoliberalism.

When labour markets are seen as imperfect, and when the employment relationship includes conflicts of interest, then one cannot rely on markets or managers to always serve workers' interests, and in extreme cases to prevent worker exploitation. Industrial relations scholars and practitioners, therefore, support institutional interventions to improve the workings of the employment relationship and to protect workers' rights. The nature of these institutional interventions, however, differ between two camps within industrial relations.

HRM : Unitarism, Pluralism and Radicalism | Josephine Tran

In the workplace, pluralists, therefore, champion grievance procedures, employee voice mechanisms such as works councils and trade unionscollective bargaining, and labour—management partnerships. In the policy arena, pluralists advocate for minimum wage laws, occupational health and safety standards, international labour standardsand other employment and labour laws and public policies.

unitarist perspective of the employment relationship

From this perspective, the pursuit of a balanced employment relationship gives too much weight to employers' interests, and instead deep-seated structural reforms are needed to change the sharply antagonistic employment relationship that is inherent within capitalism. Militant trade unions are thus frequently supported. History[ edit ] Industrial relations has its roots in the industrial revolution which created the modern employment relationship by spawning free labour markets and large-scale industrial organizations with thousands of wage workers.

Low wages, long working hours, monotonous and dangerous work, and abusive supervisory practices led to high employee turnover, violent strikesand the threat of social instability.

unitarist perspective of the employment relationship

Intellectually, industrial relations was formed at the end of the 19th century as a middle ground between classical economics and Marxism ,[ citation needed ] with Sidney Webb and Beatrice Webb 's Industrial Democracy being a key intellectual work. Institutionally, industrial relations was founded by John R. Commons when he created the first academic industrial relations program at the University of Wisconsin in Wight Bakkewhich began in Chamberlain at Yale and Columbia universities.

Industrial relations was formed with a strong problem-solving orientation [27] that rejected both the classical economists' laissez-faire solutions to labour problems and the Marxist solution of class revolution.